[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]
Subject: [sitefinder-tech-discuss] Letter to editors news.com article by Verisign rep
Following is text of email I posted to the letters to the editor addres at cnet this morning. =================================================== Re: http://news.com.com/2010-1071-5086769.html How can news.com publish such drivel by a Verisign representative and keep a straight editorial face? Verisign, without prior warning, implemented a service that broke DNS, the backbone and heart of the Internet. It broke anti-spam lists worldwide. It triggered the IRC to release two quick patches to DNS to repair the damage done by Verisign, costing administrators worldwide hours of unnecessary labor to try and restore stability to DNS. The author of this piece sounds like your typical non-technical PHB who doesn't understand that the web is NOT the Internet, and a HELL of a lot more things that a URL redirect depend on DNS that functions according to established RFCs. I would not be surprised if this writer thought an RFC was something he would order for breakfast at a KFC rather than a standard reference for interoperability. ICANN acted correctly when it issued its cease and desist letter to Verisign. It is a shame it took two weeks to do so, it should have taken two hours. The registrars and businesses that are suing Verisign for their back teeth over this unconscionable act of sabatoge of a key service on which the Internet depends to function acted correctly. And the judge in those cases that will inevitably find in the plaintiffs favor and against Verislime, or excuse me, Verisign, will be acting correctly. As far as I am concerned, this is the last straw. The Department of Commerce should immediately rescind the recently announced three years extension of contract with Verisign. It should declare Verisign no longer eligible to even apply for any of the delegated roles and trusts it now has for the a. TLD server and the .com and .net primary registries, and a new contract should be let to a company that is willing and ready to adhere to its contracts, and adhere to standards of Internet programming and interoperability. --- Ron. http://edgeinfotech.com http://keepamericafree.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC