sitefinder-tech-discuss message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]


Subject: Re: [sitefinder-tech-discuss] Technical issues encountered by a k12 site


Rodney Thayer wrote:

At 12:50 PM 10/8/2003 -0400, anewton@verisignlabs.com wrote:

For the purposes of constructive dialog, how much advance notice do you feel should be given?


I think "advanced notice" should consist of:

-- a document describing the proposed change. Internet Draft styling would be my
     suggested format.
-- a proposed deployment time frame, NOT to be implemented until the community has
     offered feedback
-- a second notice, documenting Verisign's perceived input from the community, and including
     a firm proposed deployment schedule

(all of this plus or minus reasonable technical and scheduling issues and delays, of course.)

This is a good suggestion.  Thank you.

In which forums to you believe we should send the notice? Throwing out a proposed list:

  IETF Main discussion list
  NANOG
  RIPE
  APNIC
  LACNIC

-andy



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC