wildcard NAPTR ( was [sitefinder-tech-discuss] followup from 15oct secsac )

[Andrew Newton <anewton@verisignlabs.com>]

bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> 	in any case... how would folks feel about something like this:
>
> 	com.  in soa (bits'o'rr)
> 	      in ns  lumpy.
> 	      in ns  gravy.
> 	*     in naptr (naptr-bits)
>
> 	whango z tango --- no pesky A rr... :)

Bill,

You've said it here and you said it at NANOG, and I bet you are getting 
blank stares... but the more and more I think of this, the more I 
believe you are on to something (again, I'm not too swift sometimes).

With the proper context (i.e. draft-daigle-napstr-02.txt), this might be 
the long-term solution.  Is this where you were going?

-andy


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/unsubscribe>