Re: wildcard NAPTR ( was [sitefinder-tech-discuss] followup from

[Kee Hinckley <nazgul@somewhere.com>]

At 4:28 AM -0700 10/22/03, bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> 	the propoal outlined above recommends that -IF- wildcards
> 	are to be used in the context of sitefinder, that it would
> 	be more advantagious to select the NAPTR rr-type than the
> 	A rr-type.  Selection of the A rr-type raises the issue

Got it.

Of course it still doesn't answer the question of how I validate 
whether a particular host exists when I'm entering data in some 
arbitrary program.  It just makes the problem less common.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/         Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/  Writings on Technology and Society

I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/unsubscribe>