Re: wildcard NAPTR ( was [sitefinder-tech-discuss] followup from

[bmanning@karoshi.com]

> At 4:28 AM -0700 10/22/03, bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> >	the propoal outlined above recommends that -IF- wildcards
> >	are to be used in the context of sitefinder, that it would
> >	be more advantagious to select the NAPTR rr-type than the
> >	A rr-type.  Selection of the A rr-type raises the issue
> 
> Got it.
> 
> Of course it still doesn't answer the question of how I validate 
> whether a particular host exists when I'm entering data in some 
> arbitrary program.  It just makes the problem less common.
> -- 
> Kee Hinckley

	actually, it does.  -IF- the wildcard(s) used are not bound
	to an "A" rr-type, you get RCODE-3 back... :)

--bill
	

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.elistx.com/unsubscribe>