[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]
Subject: Re: [sitefinder-tech-discuss] Pseudo code please
Andrew Newton wrote:
Jeff McAdams wrote:> And with these two sentences, you demonstrate, clearly, that you (Andy),> and you (Verisign) "don't get it." Taking my VeriSign hat off (since you made it personal):Perhaps I don't -- literally. I just checked the logs for my personal mail server that serves my own domain and a few others. In the last 4 weeks, only 0.25% of its traffic had domains that did not exist (technically, it is domains that did not verify, but people take that as an existence check). Contrast that with this: 0.65% forged addresses from hotmail.com, and 0.41% forged addresses from yahoo.com. Meanwhile, my spam folder says that spamprobe has filtered 5.26% of that mail just for me.So yeah... consider me a skeptic... even if it is not politically correct.
Well, let's start with the simple idea that the Internet is not just web and email.
Second, let's continue with the idea that just because you don't see something, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Third, even if *no* bad effects result from wildcards in .com/.net, that doesn't give Verisign the right to unilaterally add them. Yes, there is a political component to that, but understand that Verisign *will* ultimately regret it if they ignore that point. Verisign is very neatly managing to align nearly all of the technical community against them. That's a really bad idea.
I'm serious...if I were in your shoes, I'd have resume's out...if Verisign doesn't get some clue infusion, and fast, there's going to be pain. That's my prediction...I don't intend to do anything untoward, but I'm trying to open your eyes, and hopefully the eyes of those at Verisign. This isn't just a few mal-contents not wanting someone to be successful. This is virtually *ALL* of the major Internet operations incurring *significant* costs to work around Verisign's opportunism.
The costs incurred by Internet operators has already been significant...just for the weeks that the wildcards existed previously. I promise you, as for-profit companies, if they incur costs like this do to Verisign's actions, and its been amply demonstrated that they definitely will, that ultimately Verisign will regret the decision (assuming that the executives are intelligent enough to realize why their business suddenly took a turn for the worse).
Get out Andy, get out while you can. -- Jeff McAdams "He who laughs last, thinks slowest." -- anonymous
Attachment:
pgpmdftmqpxx9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [sitefinder-tech-discuss Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC